Skip to main content
Literature Meta

Return to Question

replaced http://meta.literature.stackexchange.com/ with https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

The question arose out of this Meta answer and comments on itthis Meta answer and comments on it.

Should we, as a rule, consider the question's answer to be higher quality if it's based on an opinion of a literature critic?

(assume that either the critic's opinion, or a competing answer's non-critic-based one, have the same amount of actual backing by text citations etc...)

The question arose out of this Meta answer and comments on it.

Should we, as a rule, consider the question's answer to be higher quality if it's based on an opinion of a literature critic?

(assume that either the critic's opinion, or a competing answer's non-critic-based one, have the same amount of actual backing by text citations etc...)

The question arose out of this Meta answer and comments on it.

Should we, as a rule, consider the question's answer to be higher quality if it's based on an opinion of a literature critic?

(assume that either the critic's opinion, or a competing answer's non-critic-based one, have the same amount of actual backing by text citations etc...)

Source Link
DVK
DVK
  • 4.7k
  • 8
  • 23

Should we treat critics' opinions higher in answers?

The question arose out of this Meta answer and comments on it.

Should we, as a rule, consider the question's answer to be higher quality if it's based on an opinion of a literature critic?

(assume that either the critic's opinion, or a competing answer's non-critic-based one, have the same amount of actual backing by text citations etc...)