Tagging works best when it can emerge naturally. While the community should step in in instances where tagging practices arent being useful, trying to plan tagging practices from the beginning is usually a bad idea. If you let people just tag questions and create tags when its intuitive to do so, then what happens is you'll get tags that people use and that are intuitive, even if they are sometimes logically inconsistent. If you try to plan tagging on meta, then you run the risk of creating a system that is logically consistent but not useful.
As usual, there's something to be learned from the RPG Stack Exchange:
Tagging is an emergent folksonomy. It does not need to be a strict logically correct hierarchy and overlap between two tags is not something we must do something about. Let people use the tags they find helpful and make sense to them. Overly curated tagging is IMO harmful to the point behind them and turns it into an advanced-users-only Dewey Decimal system instead of just letting people use terms that are meaningful to normal players.
In other words, this hypothetical tag applies to exactly zero questions right now. If we get musical questions and you think a tag would be useful, create the tag. We'll then be able to see how the tag works in practice and whether it is actually intuitive and useful.