Timeline for Do we need such broad tags on questions about specific works?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2020 at 8:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jan 30, 2017 at 21:26 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @Nathaniel I have quite a bit of experience of SE's tagging philosophy and I agree with you. [mexican-literature] and such are exactly what tags would be useful for. | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 1:38 | comment | added | Nathaniel is protesting | @Catija I probably have plenty to learn with regards to SE's generic tagging philosophy. I'm not sure why russian lit vs. mexican lit isn't more similar than not to java vs. c++. But practically speaking, it seems to me that they should be connected because they are connected by literature experts who specialize in this field. They put these authors on the same graduate-course syllabi. Put another way, [mexican-lit] + [racism] tagged questions will deal with much more specific issues than those tagged just [racism]. Maybe there's a better way to capture this idea in tags. | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:49 | comment | added | Catija | @Nathaniel why do they need to be connected? That's not what tags on SE are for. | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:29 | comment | added | Nathaniel is protesting | Alright. I want to agree with you, but based on this, tags would do nothing to connect Juan Rulfo and Rosario Castellanos, even though both are 20th century Mexicans who wrote harshly realistic short stories. If I understand correctly, that means questions about their works wouldn't be associated with each other in "related questions" unless the question text itself had similarities, or the actual subject matter of the stories was similar (and thus both could have a racism tag, for example). | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @Nathaniel For consistency, yes. | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:16 | comment | added | Nathaniel is protesting | Some of these are big (russian literature, united states), but others are fairly small and somewhat more distinctive (mexico, brazilian-literature). Am I understanding correctly that you would eliminate the smaller ones as well? | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:10 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 66 characters in body
|
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:10 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | YES. +1. This is the same point I was trying to make here and in other places. Thanks for writing this up - it will hopefully make our life much easier in the future when it comes to tags on this site. | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 18:01 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |