Timeline for Should we treat critics' opinions higher in answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.literature.stackexchange.com/ with https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 18, 2017 at 20:57 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Yes. But everybody is a critic, so we should treat everybody's opinions higher. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:42 | answer | added | HDE 226868 | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:38 | answer | added | Aurora0001 | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:34 | comment | added | Cahir Mawr Dyffryn æp Ceallach | In times of hobbyist blogs and their abundance, the lines become quite blurry of who an actual critic is. A quote/link does not necessarily an authority make. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:33 | comment | added | DVK | @ChristianRau - someone who writes literature criticism professionally or semi-professionally? But yeah, good point, and a good reason to answer "no", perhaps. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:32 | comment | added | Cahir Mawr Dyffryn æp Ceallach | But then again, what's a "literature critic"? | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:32 | comment | added | DForck42 | I think having backing references in general makes an answer of higher quality | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:29 | history | asked | DVK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |